On Annotation
-
As a key scholarly activity, annotation seems to have transitioned seamlessly from print to digital. In the process, it has lost many of the shackles of the print medium: limitations of length or of a single perspective and perceived authority, are no longer an issue. Embracing a multi-faceted annotation approach brings its own challenges, however, it forces the editor to think systematically about the form, purpose, and audience of his annotations, and how he can facilitate, mediate, and communicate the process.
Alexander Huber, Bodleian Library, Oxford
Archives
- July 2025
- July 2024
- April 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- November 2022
- October 2022
- January 2021
- August 2020
- May 2019
- February 2019
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- October 2017
- February 2017
- July 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
Posts by T-Stoesser
-
TEASys in the Digital English handbook
A contribution on classroom activities based on TEASys with regard to Shakespeare’s Sonnet 43 is now included in the Digital English handbook, an evolving, open-access handbook aimed at university teachers […]
-
An article on writing explanatory notes
Recently the blog for The New Edinburgh Edition of the Collected Works of Robert Louis Stevenson ran an article on “Writing explanatory notes” by Richard Dury. He offers Lesley Graham’s […]
-
The TEASys style guide
This homepage now includes the TEASys style guide, a continually updated style sheet for creating annotations with TEASys. Its aim is to help students and scholars alike in systematizing the […]
-
In focus: the Annotated Web Edition Directory
Part of our research in annotation and the development of TEASys is to survey the practice of digital annotation as it is carried out by the many different literary editions […]
-
-
-